John C. Wright on Writing
I enjoy the wit and wisdom of spec fic writer John C. Wright. He was interviewed on his wife’s blog about advice to writers. It seems I have some work to do…
—
John C. Wright on Writing
I enjoy the wit and wisdom of spec fic writer John C. Wright. He was interviewed on his wife’s blog about advice to writers. It seems I have some work to do…
—
Follow Up on BoneMan’s Daughters
I reviewed BoneMan’s Daughters almost 2 weeks ago, but there is still a lot of buzz about it. I read an article on CNN.com today with a catchy headline: ‘BoneMan’ creator grew up with cannibals. Hard to top that, methinks.
Here’s the article about Ted and his place in (or out) of Christian fiction. There are some memorable quotes by an editor, Henry Carrigan, that I want to share as well:
“Good writing is lacking in a lot of Christian fiction. It’s pedantic, the prose is awful, the writing is static and it’s difficult to believe the characters,” Carrigan says.
Though Christian publishers pushed hard to get their authors on mainstream shelves, what eventually did often was shelved away from fiction under a subsection called “inspirational fiction.” “Even though they made the crossover, they didn’t make the crossover. They were ghettoized,” Carrigan says.
Dekker has succeeded, Carrigan says, because “he knows how to write.” Describing Dekker’s style as ” ‘CSI’ meets God and Satan,” the editor observes, “He knows how to use the formula when he uses a formula. He can suck people in. That’s why he’s been so successful.”
So what does this say about Dekker and Christian fiction in general? Thoughts?
—
Follow Up on BoneMan’s Daughters
I reviewed BoneMan’s Daughters almost 2 weeks ago, but there is still a lot of buzz about it. I read an article on CNN.com today with a catchy headline: ‘BoneMan’ creator grew up with cannibals. Hard to top that, methinks.
Here’s the article about Ted and his place in (or out) of Christian fiction. There are some memorable quotes by an editor, Henry Carrigan, that I want to share as well:
“Good writing is lacking in a lot of Christian fiction. It’s pedantic, the prose is awful, the writing is static and it’s difficult to believe the characters,” Carrigan says.
Though Christian publishers pushed hard to get their authors on mainstream shelves, what eventually did often was shelved away from fiction under a subsection called “inspirational fiction.” “Even though they made the crossover, they didn’t make the crossover. They were ghettoized,” Carrigan says.
Dekker has succeeded, Carrigan says, because “he knows how to write.” Describing Dekker’s style as ” ‘CSI’ meets God and Satan,” the editor observes, “He knows how to use the formula when he uses a formula. He can suck people in. That’s why he’s been so successful.”
So what does this say about Dekker and Christian fiction in general? Thoughts?
—
Tense Writing, Day 2
Yesterday I started talking about the book I’m currently reading, Elisha’s Bones. There were two comments from yesterday.
Robert- There is plenty of suspense and the reader is left hanging at the end of chapters a lot, but that wasn’t what I was looking for.
Mark- Ding, ding, we have a winner!
We get so used to patterns and techniques that we may not always notice a difference. It took me a few pages to realize why I was a little unsettled by Elisha – it was written in the present tense.
Think about it. Most fiction writing is done in the past tense. Other tenses come into play with conversations or other situations, but it is rare to see a book in a first person point of view (POV to all the writers out there) moving along in present tense. First person POV gives more intimacy to that character’s thoughts, but I’m finding in Elisha that using the present tense gives even more immediate reaction. The past tense gives the impression that the character is relating something that’s already happened back to the reader. Present tense puts the action right now, and offers up opportunity for surprises (like when the main character gets whapped in the nose).
I mentioned yesterday that we are creatures of habit. It took a few chapters to fully get comfortable reading this book. Sometimes I think it creates some awkward sentence structure, or isn’t fully true to how life works. When the POV character gets hit in the nose, he has a couple of thoughts before the impact. I don’t think we’d really be cognizant of all that was happening before such an impact.
Overall, I’m really enjoying this book. The different tense is comfortable now, and the writer is doing a good job of using it to his advantage. It was hard yesterday to write my one paragraph in present tense, so I can’t imagine writing a whole book that way!
For another example of risk-taking in Christian fiction, I can also recommend Travis Thrasher’s novel Blinded. It doesn’t involve tense, but POV. He writes it totally in second person POV (“You saw the beautiful blonde approach the table. You manage to not lose the contents of your drink as your hand shakes.”) This is generally considered a huge no-no, but according to novelist Brandilyn Collins, he pulls it off. I haven’t read it yet, but it is on my list of “when I get caught up enough I’m going to get it” books.
It’s great to see different tactics that pay off. I hope people don’t stumble over different techniques, because so far Elisha is a winner. I’ll have more on it in the blog tour for it in April.
—
Tense Writing, Day 2
Yesterday I started talking about the book I’m currently reading, Elisha’s Bones. There were two comments from yesterday.
Robert- There is plenty of suspense and the reader is left hanging at the end of chapters a lot, but that wasn’t what I was looking for.
Mark- Ding, ding, we have a winner!
We get so used to patterns and techniques that we may not always notice a difference. It took me a few pages to realize why I was a little unsettled by Elisha – it was written in the present tense.
Think about it. Most fiction writing is done in the past tense. Other tenses come into play with conversations or other situations, but it is rare to see a book in a first person point of view (POV to all the writers out there) moving along in present tense. First person POV gives more intimacy to that character’s thoughts, but I’m finding in Elisha that using the present tense gives even more immediate reaction. The past tense gives the impression that the character is relating something that’s already happened back to the reader. Present tense puts the action right now, and offers up opportunity for surprises (like when the main character gets whapped in the nose).
I mentioned yesterday that we are creatures of habit. It took a few chapters to fully get comfortable reading this book. Sometimes I think it creates some awkward sentence structure, or isn’t fully true to how life works. When the POV character gets hit in the nose, he has a couple of thoughts before the impact. I don’t think we’d really be cognizant of all that was happening before such an impact.
Overall, I’m really enjoying this book. The different tense is comfortable now, and the writer is doing a good job of using it to his advantage. It was hard yesterday to write my one paragraph in present tense, so I can’t imagine writing a whole book that way!
For another example of risk-taking in Christian fiction, I can also recommend Travis Thrasher’s novel Blinded. It doesn’t involve tense, but POV. He writes it totally in second person POV (“You saw the beautiful blonde approach the table. You manage to not lose the contents of your drink as your hand shakes.”) This is generally considered a huge no-no, but according to novelist Brandilyn Collins, he pulls it off. I haven’t read it yet, but it is on my list of “when I get caught up enough I’m going to get it” books.
It’s great to see different tactics that pay off. I hope people don’t stumble over different techniques, because so far Elisha is a winner. I’ll have more on it in the blog tour for it in April.
—